Wild bee and vegetation diversity in urban mini forests: a baseline for a multi-site assessment

Abstract ID: 3.161
| Not reviewed yet
| TBA
| TBA
Hörmann, G. M. (1)
Oswald, M. (2); Kodym, A. (3); Malfent, F. (4, 5); Rotteneder, M. (1); Schoder, S. (1); Reverté Saiz, S. (6); and Pachinger, B. (1)
(1) Institute of Integrative Nature Conservation, Department of Ecosystem Management, Climate and Biodiversity, BOKU University, Vienna, Austria
(2) Independent Researcher, Hernalser Hauptstraße 104/28, 1170 Vienna, Austria
(3) Austrian Research Center for Forests, Forest Biodiversity and Nature Conservation, Vienna, Austria
(4) Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Division of General Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
(5) Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
(6) Laboratory of Zoology, University of Mons, Research Institute for Biosciences, Mons, Belgium
How to cite: Hörmann, G. M.; Oswald, M.; Kodym, A.; Malfent, F.; Rotteneder, M.; Schoder, S.; Reverté Saiz, S.; and Pachinger, B.: Wild bee and vegetation diversity in urban mini forests: a baseline for a multi-site assessment, #TDB27-3.161
Categories: No categories defined
Keywords: Urban ecosystem, Miyawaki Forest Method, Pollinator, Life history traits, Tiny forests
Categories: No categories defined
Keywords: Urban ecosystem, Miyawaki Forest Method, Pollinator, Life history traits, Tiny forests
Abstract
[e2pdf-download id="7"]
Download
Download

Urban green spaces may facilitate foraging and habitat resources for wild bees. To assess the potential of urban mini forests for wild bee conservation, we investigated five mini forest sites in eastern Austria for wild bee and plant species diversity. We analyzed the effects of surrounding land-use structures and flower richness and abundance on total wild bee species richness and life history traits (LHTs) through generalized linear mixed models. Overall, 97 different wild bee species and 174 different plant species were documented. The bee community was dominated by generalist species (66%), as opposed to specialists (oligolectic; 22%). The wild bee community was composed of mainly solitary species (66%), followed by eusocial species (18%), and parasitic species (12%). The analysis showed that plant richness per se had no direct influence on wild bee species richness or the proportion of oligolectic species, but the number of plants in bloom within the mini forest sites had a strong influence on wild bee species richness, increasing both overall wild bee diversity and the proportion of oligolectic species. Given the ongoing succession of these mini forest sites, however, wild bee diversity is likely to decline over time. Targeted planning and management of such sites are therefore important to support wild bees and promote species associated with open habitats.

We are processing your request… Just a few seconds — thanks for your patience… Almost done — preparing everything for you… Huuuh… this seems to be a difficult thing 🤔 I’m not sure if I can manage this right now… Please refresh the page — I think something went wrong.
If this happens again, please get in touch with us.